Hand kneading vs stand mixer, my 20 minute epiphany in Cleveland

I used to swear by my stand mixer for every dough, thought hand kneading was for people without arms or patience. Last Sunday I had to make two loaves at a friend's place in Cleveland, no mixer in sight, so I dove in. I timed myself: 18 minutes of hand kneading got the same windowpane test as 10 minutes of machine mixing, which shocked me. The texture felt more alive, and the bread rose maybe 15% faster in the afternoon sun, not bad for free exercise. Still, my wrists were sore the next day, so I'm not fully converted. Has anyone else noticed a real difference in flavor or crumb between the two methods, or was it just a fluke with that particular flour?

1 comments

1 Comment

the_miles24d ago

...and honestly I think you got lucky with that flour, because every time I've hand kneaded I get a denser crumb and a less consistent rise, the machine just beats it into submission more evenly. You mentioned the windowpane timing, but what about the gluten development over a week of cold fermenting, the mixer dough always holds up better in my fridge. The sore wrists thing is the real tell, your body was telling you it was doing way more work for a marginal gain, so I'll stick with my KitchenAid until someone blind taste tests a dozen loaves and proves me wrong.