Loading…
6
Got called out for only watching videos, now I actually read the full reports
Last week my buddy Dave in the chat told me I was just parroting headlines and had no clue about the source documents. He pointed out I never looked at the actual court filing from the 2022 case we argue about all the time. So I sat down with 47 pages of legalese and highlighted the key parts myself. Turns out the mainstream summary left out two big procedural details that change the whole angle. I felt dumb for three years of hot takes built on someone else's cliff notes. Now I check the original PDF before I post anything in here. Has anyone else switched from video recaps to primary sources and found their opinions flipped completely?
0 comments
Log in to join the discussion
Log In0 Comments
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this discussion.